Evolución y perfeccionamiento de técnicas endourológicas (urs y nlpc) sin fluoroscopia. Revisión sistemática de la literatura / Has fluoroless endourology (URS and PCNL) come of age? Evidence from a comprehensive literature review

Introducción La radiación es una herramienta fundamental en las técnicas de imagen ampliamente utilizadas en el manejo de los cálculos renales. Entre las medidas básicas que suelen adoptar los endourólogos para reducir la cantidad de exposición a la radiación, se encuentran el principio As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) —basado en reducir el uso de la radiación tanto como sea razonablemente posible— y el empleo de técnicas sin fluoroscopia. Se realizó una revisión exploratoria de la literatura para investigar el éxito y la seguridad de la ureteroscopia (URS) o la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) sin fluoroscopia para el tratamiento de los cálculos renales. Métodos Se realizó una revisión de la literatura mediante la búsqueda en las bases de datos bibliográficas PubMed, EMBASE y la biblioteca Cochrane, y se incluyeron en la revisión 14 artículos completos de acuerdo con las directrices de la declaración PRISMA. Resultados De un total de 2.535 procedimientos analizados, se realizaron 823 URS sin fluoroscopia frente a 556 URS con fluoroscopia, y 734 NLPC sin fluoroscopia frente a 277 NLPC con fluoroscopia. La tasa libre de cálculos (TLC) de la URS sin fluoroscopia frente a la guiada por fluoroscopia fue del 85,3 y el 77%, respectivamente (p=0,2), y las TLC de la NLPC sin fluoroscopia frente al grupo con fluoroscopia fueron del 83,8 y el 84,6%, respectivamente (p=0,9). Las complicaciones globales Clavien-Dindo I/II y III/IV para los procedimientos con y sin fluoroscopia fueron del 3,1 (n=71), 8,5 (n=131), 1,7 (n=23) y 3% (n=47), respectivamente. Solo 5 estudios informaron de un fracaso del abordaje realizado con fluoroscopia, con un total de 30 (1,3%) procedimientos fallidos. Conclusión Durante los últimos años han surgido diversas maneras de aplicar el protocolo ALARA en endourología en un esfuerzo por proteger tanto a los pacientes como al personal sanitario. ... (AU)

Introduction Radiation via the use of imaging is a key tool in management of kidney stones. Simple measures are largely taken by the endourologists to implement the ‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (ALARA) principle, including the use of fluoroless technique. We performed a scoping literature review to investigate the success and safety of fluoroless ureteroscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures for the treatment of KSD. Methods A literature review was performed searching bibliographic databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, and 14 full papers were included in the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results Of the 2535 total procedures analysed, 823 were fluoroless URS vs. 556 fluoroscopic URS; and 734 fluoroless PCNL vs. 277 fluoroscopic PCNL. The SFR for fluoroless vs. fluoroscopic guided URS was 85.3% and 77%, respectively (P=.2), while for fluoroless PCNL vs. fluoroscopic group was 83.8% and 84.6%, respectively (P=.9). The overall Clavien-Dindo I/II and III/IV complications for fluoroless and fluoroscopic guided procedures were 3.1% (n=71) and 8.5% (n=131), and 1.7% (n=23) and 3% (n=47) respectively. Only 5 studies reported a failure of the fluoroscopic approach with a total of 30 (1.3%) failed procedures. Conclusion The ALARA protocol has been implemented in endourology in numerous ways to protect both patients and healthcare workers during recent years. Fluoroless procedures for treatment of KSD are safe and effective with outcomes comparable to standard procedures and could become the new frontier of endourology in selected cases. (AU)

Has fluoroless endourology (URS and PCNL) come of age? Evidence from a comprehensive literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation via the use of imaging is a key tool in management of kidney stones. Simple measures are largely taken by the endourologists to implement the 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' (ALARA) principle, including the use of fluoroless technique. We performed a scoping literature review to investigate the success and safety of fluoroless ureteroscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures for the treatment of KSD. METHODS: A literature review was performed searching bibliographic databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, and 14 full papers were included in the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 2535 total procedures analysed, 823 were fluoroless URS vs. 556 fluoroscopic URS; and 734 fluoroless PCNL vs. 277 fluoroscopic PCNL. The SFR for fluoroless vs. fluoroscopic guided URS was 85.3% and 77%, respectively (p=0.2), while for fluoroless PCNL vs. fluoroscopic group was 83.8% and 84.6%, respectively (p=0.9). The overall Clavien-Dindo I/II and III/IV complications for fluoroless and fluoroscopic guided procedures were 3.1% (n=71) and 8.5% (n=131), and 1.7% (n=23) and 3% (n=47) respectively. Only 5 studies reported a failure of the fluoroscopic approach with a total of 30 (1.3%) failed procedures. CONCLUSION: The ALARA protocol has been implemented in endourology in numerous ways to protect both patients and healthcare workers during recent years. Fluoroless procedures for treatment of KSD are safe and effective with outcomes comparable to standard procedures and could become the new frontier of endourology in selected cases.

Uso de vaina asistida por vacío en mininefrolitotomía percutánea (mini-NLPC) en decúbito supino / Vacuum-assisted access sheath in supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL)

Introducción La vaina de acceso asistida por vacío es un nuevo dispositivo para el tratamiento de los cálculos renales mediante nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC). Objetivo Nuestro objetivo fue comparar la tasa libre de litiasis (TLL) y las complicaciones entre la mini-NLPC estándar y la asistida por vacío (VaNLPC). Método Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes intervenidos mediante mini-NLPC y VaNLPC desde enero de 2018 hasta junio de 2022. La VaNLPC se realizó con una vaina desechable (ClearPetra®) que permite la conexión de aspiración por un canal lateral facilitando la extracción de fragmentos. Se recogieron las características basales de los pacientes, los resultados quirúrgicos y los datos perioperatorios y postoperatorios. Se compararon en cuanto a las complicaciones y la TLL. Resultados Identificamos 136 pacientes, 57 (41,9%) intervenidos con VaNLPC y 79 (58,15%) con mini-NLPC. El tiempo quirúrgico medio fue significativamente menor en el grupo VaNLPC (95 min) que en el mini-NLPC (146 min; p = 0,001). La técnica tubeless se realizó con mayor frecuencia en el grupo VaNLPC (61,4 vs. 34,2%; p = 0,002). No se observaron diferencias en las complicaciones postoperatorias. El tiempo medio de hospitalización fue significativamente inferior en el grupo VaNLPC con 1,7 días por paciente frente a 2,7 días en el grupo mini-NLPC (p = 0,001). No hubo diferencias en la TLL a los tres meses entre VaNLPC (71,9%) y mini-NLPC (71,8%; p = 0,848). Conclusiones Los pacientes tratados con VaNLPC obtuvieron resultados comparables a la mini-NLPC, mostrando una TLL igual con similares complicaciones infecciosas. Como potenciales beneficios de la VaNLPC, se postulan menor tiempo quirúrgico y estancia postoperatoria. (AU)

Introduction The vacuum-assisted access sheath is a new device for the treatment of kidney stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Objective Our aim was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications between standard mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and vacuum-assisted PCNL (Va-PCNL). Methods Retrospective study of patients undergoing mini-PCNL and Va-PCNL from January 2018 to June 2022. Va-PCNL was performed with a disposable sheath (ClearPetra) with continuous high-flow irrigation and vacuum fluid dynamics for easier stone fragment removal. Baseline patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, perioperative and postoperative data were collected. We compared SFR and complications. Results A total of 136 patients were identified, 57 (41,9%) underwent Va-PCNL and 79 (58,15%) mini-PCNL. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Va-PCNL group (95 min.) than in mini-PCNL (146 min.; P = .001) group. The tubeless technique was performed more frequently in Va-PCNL group (61,4% vs. 34,2%; P = .002). We did not observe any differences in postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was significantly lower in Va-PCNL with 1,7 ± 1,9 days per patient compared with 2,7 ± 1,5 days in the mini-PCNL group (P = .001). There were no differences in SFR at 3 months between Va-PCNL (71,9%) and mini-PCNL (71,8%; P = .848). Conclusion Patients treated with Va-PCNL had comparable results to mini-PCNL, showing equal SFR with similar infectious complications rates. Potential benefits of Va-PCNL include shorter operative time and postoperative stay. (AU)

Vacuum-assisted access sheath in supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL).

INTRODUCTION: The vacuum-assisted access sheath is a new device for the treatment of kidney stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications between standard mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) and vacuum-assisted PCNL (Va-PCNL). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients undergoing Mini-PCNL and Va-PCNL from January 2018 to June 2022. Va-PCNL was performed with a disposable sheath (ClearPetra®) with continuous high-flow irrigation and vacuum fluid dynamics for easier stone fragment removal. Baseline patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, perioperative and postoperative data were collected. We compared SFR and complications. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were identified, 57 (41,9%) underwent Va-PCNL and 79 (58,15%) Mini-PCNL. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Va-PCNL group (95 min.) than in Mini-PCNL (146 min; P = ,001) group. The tubeless technique was performed more frequently in Va-PCNL group (61,4% vs. 34,2%; P = ,002). We did not observe any differences in postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was significantly lower in Va-PCNL with 1,7 ± 1,9 days per patient compared with 2,7 ± 1,5 days in the Mini-PCNL group (P = ,001). There were no differences in SFR at 3 months between Va-PCNL (71,9%) and Mini-PCNL (71,8%; P =v ,848). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with Va-PCNL had comparable results to Mini-PCNL, showing equal SFR with similar infectious complications rates. Potential benefits of Va-PCNL include shorter operative time and postoperative stay.

Validación externa de los sistemas de puntuación actuales y desarrollo de un nuevo sistema de puntuación para la predicción de la tasa libre de cálculos tras la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada en pacientes con un diámetro acumulado del cálculo de 2-4 cm / External validation of the current scoring systems and development of a novel scoring system to predict stone-free rates after retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with cumulative stone diameter of 2-4 cm

Objetivo Nuestro objetivo principal es realizar la validación externa de los sistemas de puntuación actuales para predecir el estado libre de cálculos (ELC) después de la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada (CRIR) para cálculos renales de 2-4 cm y desarrollar un nuevo sistema de puntuación reexaminando los posibles factores predictivos relacionados con el ELC. Métodos Se evaluaron retrospectivamente los pacientes que recibieron CRIR para el tratamiento de cálculos renales con diámetro acumulado de 2-4 cm, entre enero de 2017 y marzo de 2021. Los cálculos residuales ≤ 2 mm se definieron como clínicamente insignificantes, y estos casos se consideraron como ELC. Se examinaron los posibles factores predictivos relacionados con el ELC mediante el análisis de regresión logística multivariante. Se elaboró un nomograma y se creó un sistema de puntuación utilizando variables predictivas independientes. Mediante el análisis ROC se evaluó la capacidad de predicción de los sistemas de puntuación actuales y del recién desarrollado. Resultados Los sistemas de puntuación existentes resultaron insuficientes para predecir el ELC (AUC < 0,660 en todos los casos). Se identificaron como predictores independientes del ELC el área de superficie (OR: 0,991, p < 0,001), la densidad (OR: 0,998, p < 0,001), el número (OR: 0,365, p = 0,033) y la localización de los cálculos (p = 0,037). Utilizando estos marcadores predictivos, se desarrolló un nuevo sistema de puntuación cuyos resultados oscilan entre 4 y 15. El valor AUC de este sistema de puntuación fue de 0,802 (0,734-0,870). Conclusión Los sistemas de puntuación RUSS, S-ReSC y RIRS y el nomograma de Ito no lograron predecir el ELC en cálculos de > 2 cm. Nuestro nuevo sistema de puntuación tuvo una capacidad predictiva del ELC mayor en cálculos de > 2 cm, en comparación con los otros sistemas de puntuación (AU)

Objective Our primary aim is to perform the external validation of the current scoring systems in predicting stone-free status (SFS) after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones 2-4 cm and develop a novel scoring system by re-examining possible predictive factors related to SFS. Methods Patients who underwent RIRS due to renal stones with a cumulative stone diameter of 2-4 cm between January 2017 and March 2021 were retrospectively screened. Residual stones ≤ 2 mm were defined as clinically insignificant, and these cases were considered to have SFS. Possible predictive factors related to SFS were examined using the multivariate logistic regression analysis. A nomogram and a scoring system were developed using independent predictive variables. The prediction ability of the previous and the new scoring system were evaluated with the ROC analysis. Results The existing scoring systems were found to be insufficient in predicting SFS (AUC < 0.660 for all). The independent predictors of SFS were identified as stone surface area (OR: 0.991, p < 0.001), stone density (OR: 0.998, p < 0.001), number of stones (OR: 0.365, p = 0.033), and stone localization (p = 0.037). Using these predictive markers, a new scoring system with a score ranging between 4 and 15 was developed. The AUC value for this scoring system was 0.802 (0.734-0.870). Conclusion The RUSS, S-ReSC and RIRS scoring systems and Ito's nomogram failed to predict SFS in stones > 2 cm. The SFS predictive ability of our new scoring system was higher in > 2 cm stones compared to the other scoring systems (AU)

Comparación entre el efecto de la nefrolitotomía percutánea miniaturizada vs. convencional en la función renal evaluada mediante gammagrafía renal con DMSA / Comparison of the effect of miniaturized and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function assessed with DMSA scintigraphy

Introducción y objetivos Nos propusimos realizar un estudio clínico para comparar los efectos de la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLP) convencional y miniaturizada sobre la función renal evaluada mediante imágenes de gammagrafía en pacientes con cálculos renales primarios. Materiales y métodos Se incluyeron 104 pacientes en este estudio prospectivo entre mayo de 2014 y febrero de 2017. Los pacientes elegibles se dividieron en dos grupos: NLP miniaturizada (NLPm) y NLP convencional (NLPc) mediante muestras emparejadas (escenario 1:1). Se realizó una gammagrafía cortical con ácido dimercaptosuccínico de tecnecio-99m antes y después de la intervención. Resultados No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en cuanto a las tasas de éxito (NLPm [63,5%] frente a NLPc [71,2%], p=0,403), creatinina sérica, tasa de filtración glomerular, funciones renales diferenciales evaluadas antes y después de la intervención (p≥0,05). No hubo relación entre el tipo de procedimiento y la formación de nuevo tejido cicatricial (p=0,780). Las tasas de complicaciones graves (grados 3 y 4 según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo modificada) fueron más altas en la NLPc (p=0,034). La carga litiásica, el tiempo quirúrgico, el descenso de la hemoglobina, los accesos múltiples, la transfusión de sangre y la angioembolización fueron mayores en los pacientes con riñones cicatrizados (p<0,001, p=0,008, p=0,004, p<0,001, p=0,003, p=0,001, respectivamente). En el análisis multivariante, sólo el acceso múltiple resultó estadísticamente significativo para predecir la formación de tejido cicatricial nuevo (p<0,001, OR: 24,28). Conclusiones La NLP miniaturizada y la convencional son intervenciones fiables y efectivas para el tratamiento de cálculos renales de gran tamaño. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los dos procedimientos en cuanto a la disminución de la función renal (AU)

Introduction and Objectives We aimed to present a clinical study that compares standard and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) effects on kidney function with scintigraphic imaging in primary kidney stone patients. Materials and Methods One hundred four patients were included in this prospective study between May 2014 and February 2017. Eligible patients were divided into two groups miniaturized PNL (mPNL) and standard PNL (sPNL) with matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). Technetium-99m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid cortical scintigraphy imaging was performed before and after the operation. Results There were no differences between the two groups in terms of success rate (mPNL(63.5%) vs. sPNL(71.2%), p=0.403), serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, split renal functions pre- and postoperatively (p≥0.05). There was no relationship between the type of operation and new scar formation (p=0.780). The rates of serious complication (grades 3 and 4 according to modified Clavien-Dindo Classification) were higher in sPNL (p=0.034). Stone burden, duration of operation, hemoglobin drop, multiple access, blood transfusion, and angioembolization were higher in patients with scarred kidneys (p<0.001, p=0.008, p=0.004, p<0.001, p=0.003, p=0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only multiple access was found statistically significant for predicting new scar formation (p<0.001, OR:24.28). Conclusions Miniaturized and standard PNL are reliable and successful operations for treating large kidney stones. No significant difference was found between the operation types regarding a decrease in renal function (AU)

Comparison of the effect of miniaturized and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function assessed with DMSA scintigraphy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to present a clinical study that compares standard and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) effects on kidney function with scintigraphic imaging in primary kidney stone patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred four patients were included in this prospective study between May 2014 and February 2017. Eligible patients were divided into two groups miniaturized PNL (mPNL) and standard PNL (sPNL) with matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). Technetium-99m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid cortical scintigraphy imaging was performed before and after the operation. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups in terms of success rate (mPNL (63.5%) vs. sPNL (71.2%), p=0.403), serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, split renal functions pre- and postoperatively (p≥0.05). There was no relationship between the type of operation and new scar formation (p=0.780). The rates of serious complication (grades 3 and 4 according to modified Clavien-Dindo Classification) were higher in sPNL (p=0.034). Stone burden, duration of operation, hemoglobin drop, multiple access, blood transfusion, and angioembolization were higher in patients with scarred kidneys (p<0.001, p=0.008, p=0.004, p<0.001, p=0.003, p=0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only multiple access was found statistically significant for predicting new scar formation (p<0.001, OR: 24.28). CONCLUSIONS: Miniaturized and standard PNL are reliable and successful operations for treating large kidney stones. No significant difference was found between the operation types regarding a decrease in renal function.

External validation of the current scoring systems and derivation of a novel scoring system to predict stone free rates after retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with cumulative stone diameter of 2-4 cm.

OBJECTIVE: Our primary aim is to perform the external validation of the current scoring systems in predicting stone-free status (SFS) after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones 2-4 cm and develop a novel scoring system by re-examining possible predictive factors related to SFS. METHODS: Patients who underwent RIRS due to renal stones with a cumulative stone diameter of 2-4 cm between January 2017 and March 2021 were retrospectively screened. Residual stones ≤2 mm were defined as clinically insignificant, and these cases were considered to have SFS. Possible predictive factors related to SFS were examined using the multivariate logistic regression analysis. A nomogram and a scoring system were developed using independent predictive variables. The prediction ability of the previous and the new scoring system were evaluated with the ROC analysis. RESULTS: The existing scoring systems were found to be insufficient in predicting SFS (AUC < 0.660 for all). The independent predictors of SFS were identified as stone surface area (OR: 0.991, p < 0.001), stone density (OR: 0.998, p < 0.001), number of stones (OR: 0.365, p = 0.033), and stone localization (p = 0.037). Using these predictive markers, a new scoring system with a score ranging between 4 and 15 was developed. The AUC value for this scoring system was 0.802 (0.734-0.870). CONCLUSION: The RUSS, S-ReSC and R.I.R.S. scoring systems and Ito's nomogram failed to predict SFS in stones >2 cm. The SFS predictive ability of our new scoring system was higher in >2 cm stones compared to the other scoring systems.

Factores de riesgo independientes asociados al sangrado en la nefrolitotomía percutánea: estudio retrospectivo / Independent risk factors affecting hemorrhage in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Retrospective study

Introducción: El mayor motivo de preocupación durante el perioperatorio y postoperatorio de la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLP) es el sangrado. Se determinaron las condiciones relacionadas con la enfermedad (tamaño del cálculo, UH del cálculo, número de trayectos y diámetro) que afectan el desarrollo de esta condición, con el objetivo de conocer los factores de riesgo independientes que pueden afectar el volumen del sangrado en la NLP.Material y método: Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 308 pacientes adultos (211 hombres y 97 mujeres) sometidos al procedimiento de NLP. La anatomía renal y el tamaño de los cálculos se evaluaron mediante tomografía computarizada de corte fino sin contraste. Esta prueba de imagen se utilizó para evaluar los valores de unidades Hounsfield (UH) de los cálculos renales, la presencia de placas de ateroma y la obesidad. Se registró la diferencia entre el valor preoperatorio de hemoglobina (Hgb) y el valor de Hgb del primer día del postoperatorio. Se evaluó esta variación en función del sexo, la edad, la enfermedad vascular aterosclerótica, el pH y la densidad de la orina, el recuento de leucocitos, de linfocitos, de neutrófilos (NEU) y de plaquetas, el volumen plaquetario medio (VPM), el índice neutrófilo-linfocito (INL), el índice plaqueta-linfocito, el volumen de los cálculos, las UH y la obesidad.Resultados: La variación media de Hgb se identificó como 2,1 (desviación estándar: 1,6). Hubo correlaciones positivas, significativas y débiles entre la variación de Hgb con los valores de NEU (p=0,019), VPM (p=0,000), INL (p=0,005), volumen del cálculo (p=0,041) y UH (p=0,024). Hubo una correlación negativa significativa y débil entre la variación de la Hgb y el recuento PLT (p=0,022). No se identificaron efectos a niveles significativos del sexo (p=0,078), la presencia de placas de ateroma (p=0,949), la obesidad (p=0,869), la edad (AU)

Introduction: The perioperative and postoperative concern in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is bleeding. Disease-related conditions (such as stone size, stone HU, tract number, and diameter) affecting this situation were determined. To determine independent risk factors that may affect the amount of hemorrhage in PNL.Material and method: A total of 308 adult patients (211 men, 97 women) undergoing the PNL procedure were included in the study. Renal anatomy and stone size were evaluated using non-contrast thin-section computed tomography (NCCT). NCCT was used to assess Hounsfield unit (HU) values of kidney stones, presence of atheroma plaque and obesity. The difference between preoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) values and postoperative 1st day Hgb values was recorded. This variation was evaluated for the effect of gender, age, atherosclerotic vein disease, urine pH and density, leukocyte count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count (NEU), platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), stone volume, HU, and obesity.ResultsThe mean Hgb variation was identified as 2.1 (standard deviation: 1.6). There were positive, significant, and weak correlations between the Hgb variation with NEU (P=.019), MPV (P=.000), NLR (P=.005), stone volume (P=.041) and HU (P=.024) values. There was a negative significant and weak correlation between Hgb variation and PLT (P=.022). No effects at significant levels were identified for gender (P=.078), presence of atheroma plaque (P=.949), obesity (P=.869), age (P=.686), urine pH (P=.746), urine density (P=.421), and PLR (P=.855) on Hgb variations.Conclusion: In addition to HU and stone volume, NEU count, MPV, NLR and PLT count may be used as independent risk factors to predict blood loss during PNL (AU)

Posición óptima para la nefrolitotomía percutánea en el riñón en herradura: ¿prono tradicional o supino? / Optimal patient position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: Traditional prone or supine?

Objetivo: Aunque se ha afirmado que la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) en posición supina se asocia a tiempos quirúrgicos relativamente más cortos y a tasas de éxito y complicaciones comparables, no hay consenso en la literatura actual sobre la seguridad y la eficacia de la NLPC en posición supina en pacientes con riñón en herradura. Nuestro objetivo es comparar la NLPC en posición supina y en posición prona, en términos de seguridad y eficacia en pacientes con riñón en herradura.Métodos: Se revisaron retrospectivamente los datos de los pacientes con riñón en herradura sometidos a una NLPC por cálculos renales de más de 2cm entre enero de 2010 y mayo de 2021. Los pacientes del estudio se clasificaron como Grupo1 (NLPC en supino [SNLPC]) y Grupo2 (NLPC en prono [PNLPC]). Se compararon los datos demográficos, clínicos y quirúrgicos de los dos grupos.Resultados: Se incluyeron 65 pacientes, de los cuales 31 (47,7%) pertenecían al Grupo1 y 34 (52,3%) al Grupo2. Los datos demográficos, las características de los cálculos, los parámetros perioperatorios y las tasas de complicaciones fueron estadísticamente similares entre los dos grupos (p>0,05). No hubo diferencias estadísticas en cuanto a las tasas de tratamiento adicional y las tasas de ausencia de cálculos en los controles postoperatorios del segundo día y del tercer mes (p>0,05). El tiempo quirúrgico medio fue significativamente mayor en el Grupo2 (113±17,1minutos) que en el Grupo1 (90,6±11,3minutos) (p=0,000).Conclusión: Aunque tradicionalmente se realiza en posición prona, el abordaje en posición supina es similar en términos de seguridad y de eficacia. Además, la posición supina se asocia con tiempos quirúrgicos significativamente más cortos (AU)

Objective: Although it was stated that supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was associated with relatively shorter surgical times and comparable success and complication rates, there is no consensus in the current literature concerning the safety and efficacy of supine PCNL in patients with horseshoe kidneys. We aimed to compare supine and prone PCNL regarding safety and efficacy in patients with horseshoe kidneys.Methods: Data of the patients with horseshoe kidneys who underwent PCNL for renal stones larger than 2cm between January 2010 and May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The study patients were categorized as Group1 (i.e., supine PCNL-SPCNL) and Group2 (i.e., prone PCNL-PPCNL). Both groups were compared regarding demographic, clinical, and surgical data.Results: Sixty-five patients were included. Among these patients, 31 (47.7%) were in Group1, while 34 (52.3%) were in Group2. Both groups were statistically similar in terms of demographic data, stone characteristics, perioperative parameters, and complication rates (P>.05). There was no statistical difference in terms of additional treatment rates, stone-free rates in the postoperative second-day and third-month evaluations (P>.05). Mean surgical time was significantly longer in Group2 (113±17.1minutes) than in Group1 (90.6±11.3minutes) (P=.000).Conclusion: Although it is traditionally performed in the prone position, the supine approach is as safe and effective as the prone approach. In addition, the supine approach is associated with significantly shorter surgical times (AU)

Independent risk factors affecting hemorrhage in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The perioperative and postoperative concern in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is bleeding. Disease-related conditions (such as stone size, stone HU, tract number, and diameter) affecting this situation were determined. To determine independent risk factors that may affect the amount of hemorrhage in PNL. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 308 adult patients (211 men, 97 women) undergoing the PNL procedure were included in the study. Renal anatomy and stone size were evaluated using non-contrast thin-section computed tomography (NCCT). NCCT was used to assess Hounsfield unit (HU) values of kidney stones, presence of atheroma plaque and obesity. The difference between preoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) values and postoperative 1st day Hgb values was recorded. This variation was evaluated for the effect of gender, age, atherosclerotic vein disease, urine pH and density, leukocyte count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count (NEU), platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), stone volume, HU, and obesity. RESULTS: The mean Hgb variation was identified as 2.1 (standard deviation: 1.6). There were positive, significant, and weak correlations between the Hgb variation with NEU (P=0.019), MPV (P=0.000), NLR (P=0.005), stone volume (P=0.041) and HU (P=0.024) values. There was a negative significant and weak correlation between Hgb variation and PLT (P=0.022). No effects at significant levels were identified for gender (P=0.078), presence of atheroma plaque (P=0.949), obesity (P=0.869), age (P=0.686), urine pH (P=0.746), urine density (P=0.421), and PLR (P=0.855) on Hgb variations. CONCLUSION: In addition to HU and stone volume, NEU count, MPV, NLR and PLT count may be used as independent risk factors to predict blood loss during PNL.

Pharmacological interventions for preventing complications in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria: A systematic review / Intervenciones farmacológicas para prevenir complicaciones en pacientes con hipercalciuria idiopática: una revisión sistemática

Objective: To assess the effects of pharmacological interventions in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria. Methods: We performed a search of multiple databases, trial registries, grey literature and conference proceedings up to October 2019. We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that examined any pharmacological intervention for preventing complications of idiopathic hypercalciuria (given for at least four months and six of follow-up). The primary outcomes were stone-free patients, urinary symptoms and severe adverse events. Results: We included five RCTs (n=446 patients, all adults, 4 in individuals with kidney stones and 1 in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis). Diuretics were likely to increase the number of stone-free patients (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.33–1.96, moderate quality of evidence (QoE)); 274 more stone-free patients/1000 patients treated (95% CI: 148–432) and produced a slight decrease in the stone formation rate (mean difference −0.18, 95% CI −0.30 to −0.06, low QoE); 180 fewer stones/year/1000 patients treated (95% CI: 300 r to 60). No data on urinary symptoms were reported. The association between diuretic use and severe adverse events was uncertain (RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.60–41.88, very low QoE); 4 more severe adverse events/1000 patients treated (95% CI: 0 fewer to 39 more). Conclusions: The addition of diuretics to a normal or modified diet probably reduces the number of stone recurrences and may decrease the stone formation rate. It is uncertain whether diuretics increase the occurrence of severe adverse events. There were no studies investigating other outcomes or in children. (AU)

Objetivo: Evaluar los efectos de intervenciones farmacológicas en pacientes con hipercalciuria idiopática. Métodos: Realizamos una búsqueda en múltiples bases de datos, registros de ensayos, literatura gris y actas de congresos hasta octubre de 2019. Incluimos ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y cuasialeatorizados que examinaban cualquier intervención farmacológica para prevenir las complicaciones de la hipercalciuria idiopática (mínimo 4 meses de intervención y 6 meses de seguimiento). Los outcomes primarios fueron pacientes libres de cálculos, síntomas urinarios y efectos adversos graves. Resultados: Incluimos 5 RCT (n=446 pacientes, todos adultos, 4 en individuos con cálculos renales y uno en mujeres posmenopáusicas con osteoporosis). Los diuréticos aumentaban probablemente el número de pacientes libres de cálculos (RR 1,61; IC 95%: 1,33 a 1,96, moderada calidad de evidencia [QoE]); 274 más pacientes libres de cálculos/1.000 pacientes tratados (IC 95%: 148 a 432) y producían una ligera disminución en la tasa de formación de cálculos (diferencia media −0,18; IC 95%: −0,30 a −0,06, baja QoE); 180 menos cálculos/año/1.000 pacientes tratados (IC 95%: 300 a 60). No se informaron datos sobre síntomas urinarios. La asociación entre el uso de diuréticos y los efectos adversos graves fue incierta (RR 5,00; IC 95%: 0,60 a 41,88, muy baja QoE); 4 efectos adversos severos más/1.000 pacientes tratados (IC 95%: 0 a 39). Conclusiones: Los diuréticos añadidos a una dieta normal o modificada probablemente reducen la aparición de cálculos y pueden disminuir su tasa de formación. Es incierto si los diuréticos incrementan la ocurrencia de efectos adversos graves. No se encontraron estudios que investigaran otros outcomes o realizados en niños. (AU)

Ureteroscopia flexible sin vaina de acceso ureteral / Flexible ureteroscopy without ureteral access sheath

Introducción: La vaina de acceso ureteral (VAU) se utiliza ampliamente en la ureteroscopia flexible con litotricia con láser (URSF) por sus mejores tasas de estado libre de cálculos, menor presión intrarrenal y menos complicaciones. Sin embargo, también aumenta los costes quirúrgicos y puede lesionar la pared ureteral. El objetivo principal de nuestro estudio es comparar la seguridad y la eficacia de la URSF con y sin VAU para evaluar la justificación de su uso en todos los casos.Materiales y métodos: Hemos llevado a cabo un estudio analítico observacional retrospectivo con una base de datos prospectiva. Se incluyeron para el análisis un total de 241 pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a URSF para el tratamiento de cálculos renales y de uréter superior entre enero de 2018 y mayo de 2020 y se dividieron en dos grupos según el uso dela VAU. Se compararon los datos demográficos, las características de los cálculos, la presentación, el tiempo operatorio, la necesidad de catéter ureteral, la infección urinaria posoperatoria, el cólico renal y la necesidad de procedimientos adicionales.Resultados: Un total de 198 pacientes (82,2%) conformaron el grupo sin VAU. El tiempo operatorio fue significativamente menor en el grupo de pacientes sin VAU que en los tratados con VAU (64,6 minutos ± 29,5 vs. 89,9 minutos ±2,8, respectivamente; p 0,010). Ambos grupos presentaron tasas similares de dolor renal e infección del tracto urinario. Los procedimientos auxiliares fueron más frecuentes en el grupo con VAU (37,2 vs. 21,2%; p 0,026), pero no hubo significación en el análisis multivariante.Conclusión: La URSF sin VAU parece ser tan segura como la URSF con VAU, pero requiere menos procedimientos adicionales. Otra de las ventajas es un menor tiempo operatorio (AU)

Introduction: Ureteral access sheath (UAS) is widely used in flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURS) based on better stone-free rates, lower intrarenal pressure and fewer complications. However, it also rises surgical costs and may injure the ureteral wall. The main objective of our study is to compare safety and efficacy of FURS with and without UAS to evaluate whether its use is justified in all cases.Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective observational analytic study based on a prospective database. A total of 241 consecutive patients who underwent FURS for upper ureter and renal stones between January 2018 and May 2020 were included for analysis and divided into two groups upon UAS use. We compared demographic data, stone characteristics, prestenting, operative time, need for ureteral stent, postoperative urinary tract infection, renal colic and need for ancillary procedures.Results: A total of 198 patients (82.2%) were included in the group without UAS. Operative time was significantly shorter in the group of patients without UAS than those with UAS (64.6 minutes ± 29.5 vs. 89.9 minutes ± 2.8 respectively; p 0.010). Both groups had similar rates of colic pain and urinary tract infection. Ancillary procedures were more frequent in the UAS group (37.2 vs. 21.2%; p 0.026), but significance was lost in multivariate assessment.Conclusion: FURS without UAS seems to be as safe as FURS with UAS but requires less ancillary procedures. An additional advantage is shorter operative time (AU)

Optimal patient position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: Traditional prone or supine?

OBJECTIVE: Although it was stated that supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was associated with relatively shorter surgical times and comparable success and complication rates, there is no consensus in the current literature concerning the safety and efficacy of supine PCNL in patients with horseshoe kidneys. We aimed to compare supine and prone PCNL regarding safety and efficacy in patients with horseshoe kidneys. METHODS: Data of the patients with horseshoe kidneys who underwent PCNL for renal stones larger than 2 cm between January 2010 and May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The study patients were categorized as Group 1 (i.e., supine PCNL-SPCNL) and Group 2 (i.e., prone PCNL-PPCNL). Both groups were compared regarding demographic, clinical, and surgical data. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included. Among these patients, 31 (47.7%) were in Group 1, while 34 (52.3%) were in Group 2. Both groups were statistically similar in terms of demographic data, stone characteristics, perioperative parameters, and complication rates (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in terms of additional treatment rates, stone-free rates in the postoperative second-day and third-month evaluations (p > 0.05). Mean surgical time was significantly longer in Group 2 (113 ±â€¯17.1 min) than in Group 1 (90.6 ±â€¯11.3 min) (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Although it is traditionally performed in the prone position, the supine approach is as safe and effective as the prone approach. In addition, the supine approach is associated with significantly shorter surgical times.

Descripción de las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de pacientes con litiasis renal

Contexto: los cálculos renales son cúmulos o depósitos de minerales que se forman en los cálices, la pelvis renal o el tracto urinario. Objetivo: describir las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de una muestra de pacientes con litiasis renal, mayores de 18 años. Metodología: estudio observacional descriptivo de pacientes atendidos en una consulta ambulatoria de Nefrología en Manizales en el periodo 2010-2020, donde se contaba con estudios en sangre, orina de 24 horas y estudio fisicoquímico del cálculo, además de datos sociodemográficos y clínicos relacionados. Se fragmentaron en grupos, de acuerdo con los hallazgos encontrados en los cálculos disponibles, dividiéndose en oxalato de calcio en su totalidad, calcio mixto con otro compuesto y el último grupo de cálculo no calcio. Resultados: se identificaron 54 pacientes con nefrolitiasis, de los cuales 14 de ellos fueron excluidos. Finalmente, 40 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. La mediana de edad fue 52,5 años, predominio del sexo masculino (55 %), donde se encontró en 20,5 % hiperuricemia, hipercalcemia en 17,6 %, hiperfosfatemia en 5 % e hipercaliemia en 7,5 %. En orina se encontró: hipocitraturia en el 71,1 %, seguido de hipercalciuria (12,5 %), hiperuricosuria (10 %) e hiperoxaluria (5 %). En 17 de los pacientes (42,5 %) se logró el estudio de la composición fisicoquímica del cálculo, en ellos la variedad de calcio mixto fue la más frecuente (55,5 %). Conclusiones: este estudio describe las características de pacientes con cálculos renales, mostrando que la mayoría tiene alteraciones metabólicas asociadas a nefrolitiasis, siendo la hipocitraturia el hallazgo más frecuente y que la mayoría de los cálculos tiene calcio en su composición.

Background: Kidney stones are accumulations or mineral deposits that form in the calyces, renal pelvis, or urinary tract. Purpose: To describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of a sample of patients with kidney stones over 18 years of age. Methodology: Descriptive observational study. Patients treated in an outpatient nephrology and urology consultation in Manizales during the years 2010 to 2020, in which there were studies in blood, 24-hour urine, and a physicochemical study of the stone, as well as related sociodemographic and clinical data. They were divided into groups, according to the findings found in the available stones, dividing into calcium oxalate in its entirety, calcium mixed with another compound and the last group of non-calcium stone. Results: 54 patients with nephrolithiasis were identified, 14 of them were excluded. Finally, 40 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 52.5 years, male predominance (55%), hyperuricemia was found in 20.5%, hypercalcemia in 17.6%, hyperphosphatemia in 5% and hyperkalemia in 7.5%. In urine, hypocitraturia was found in 71.1%, followed by hypercalciuria (12.5%), hyperuricosuria (10%), and hyperoxaluria (5%). In 17 patients (42.5%) there was a result of the physicochemical composition of the stone, in them the mixed calcium variety was the most frequent (55.5%). Conclusions: This study describes the characteristics of patients with kidney stones, showing that the majority have metabolic alterations associated with nephrolithiasis, hypocitraturia being the most frequent finding, and that most stones have calcium in their composition.

Flexible ureteroscopy without ureteral access sheath.

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral access sheath (UAS) is widely used in flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURS) based on better stone-free rates, lower intrarenal pressure and fewer complications. However, it also rises surgical costs and may injure the ureteral wall. The main objective of our study is to compare safety and efficacy of FURS with and without UAS to evaluate whether its use is justified in all cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analytic study based on a prospective database. A total of 241 consecutive patients who underwent FURS for upper ureter and renal stones between January 2018 and May 2020 were included for analysis and divided into two groups upon UAS use. We compared demographic data, stone characteristics, prestenting, operative time, need for ureteral stent, postoperative urinary tract infection, renal colic and need for ancillary procedures. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients (82.2%) were included in the group without UAS. Operative time was significantly shorter in the group of patients without UAS than those with UAS (64.6 minutes ± 29.5 vs. 89.9 minutes ± 2.8 respectively; p 0.010). Both groups had similar rates of colic pain and urinary tract infection. Ancillary procedures were more frequent in the UAS group (37.2 vs. 21.2%; p 0.026), but significance was lost in multivariate assessment. CONCLUSION: FURS without UAS seems to be as safe as FURS with UAS but requires less ancillary procedures. An additional advantage is shorter operative time.

Usefulness and acceptability of a Smart pH meter and mobile medical App as a monitoring tool in patients with urolithiasis: short-term prospective study. / Utilidad y aceptabilidad de un pH-metro inteligente y una aplicación móvil de salud como herramienta de monitorización en pacientes con urolitiasis: estudio prospectivo a corto plazo.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Usefulness and Acceptability of a Smart pH Meter and Mobile Medical App as a Monitoring Tool in Patients with Urolithiasis: Short-term Prospective Study. OBJECTIVE: An accurate strategy for regularly measuring urine pH is the use of portable electronic pH meters. This study evaluated the usefulness and acceptability of the smart Lit-Control® pH Meter connected with a companion mobile medical application (myLit-Control(R) App) used by patients with urolithiasis for home monitoring of urine pH. We also examined adherence and compliance rates, and users´ satisfaction levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective study conducted in 10 centers from Spain. Adult patients with a history of urolithiasis were recruited and instructed to carry out a pH measurement with the pH meter three times per day for two weeks. User tasks included turning on the device, registration and on boarding processes in the App, sync the device and the App, and data dumping. At the end of the trial, we evaluated the level of adherence and usage compliance. Participants' perceptions about the usefulness, acceptability, and satisfaction with the device/App were collected through the Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) and subjective surveys. RESULTS: Participants were 27 men and 10 women. The mean age of participants was 48.7 (SD = 10.4) years, ranging from 25 to 66. The predominant type of stone was calcium oxalate. The mean pH of all readings was 5.83 (SD = 0.41). Seventy-three (73%) patients met the "good adherence" criterion (not being more than 2 days without recording any pH value). The compliance (actual vs. theoretical readings) was 87.6%. Participants rated the usability of the App 5.4 and above (on a 7-point scale) in all the items of CSUQ. Satisfaction was high, as indicated by the mean score of 6.0 in item 16. In the subjective questionnaire (0 to 3 scale), nearly all mean values were above 2. Patients scored their probability to recommend the App with an average of 8.2 on a 0 to 10 scale. CONCLUSION: The new smart Lit-Control® pH Meter and the accompanying medical App were deemed useful and acceptable by urolithiasis patients as a portable tool for urine pH monitoring at home. The usage compliance rates were high and the satisfaction with the products was good.

OBJETIVO: La utilización de pH-metroselectrónicos portátiles supone una estrategiaprecisa para medir regularmente el pH de la orina.Este estudio evaluó la utilidad y la aceptabilidad delpH-metro inteligente Lit-Control® conectado con unaaplicación móvil complementaria (myLit-Control(R)App) para la monitorización domiciliaria del pH de laorina por pacientes con nefrolitiasis. También examinamoslas tasas de adherencia y cumplimiento, y losniveles de satisfacción de los usuarios. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudioprospectivo y multicéntrico realizado en 10 centros deEspaña. Se reclutaron pacientes adultos con antecedentesde litiasis urinaria, a los que se les indicó querealizaran una medición del pH con el pH-metro tresveces al día durante un período de dos semanas. Lastareas del usuario incluyeron encender el dispositivo,instalación y registro en la aplicación, sincronizar ambossistemas y volcado de datos. Al final de la prueba,evaluamos el nivel de adherencia y cumplimiento dela monitorización. Las percepciones de los participantessobre la utilidad, aceptabilidad y satisfacción conel dispositivo/aplicación se obtuvieron a través delCuestionario de Usabilidad de Sistemas Informáticos(CSUQ) y encuestas subjetivas. RESULTADOS: Los participantes fueron 27 hombresy 10 mujeres. La edad media de los participantesfue 48,7 (DE = 10,4) años, con un rango de 25 a66. El tipo de cálculo predominante fue de oxalato decalcio. El pH promedio de todas las lecturas fue 5,83(DE = 0,41). Setenta y tres (73%) pacientes cumplieronel criterio de "buena adherencia" (no estar másde 2 días sin registrar ningún valor de pH). El cumplimiento(lecturas reales frente a lecturas teóricas) fuedel 87,6%. Los participantes calificaron la usabilidadde la aplicación en 5,4 o superior (en una escala de 7puntos) en todos los ítems de CSUQ. La satisfacciónfue alta, según la puntuación media de 6,0 en el ítem16. En el cuestionario subjetivo (escala de 0 a 3), casitodos los valores medios estaban por encima de 2. Lospacientes puntuaron su probabilidad de recomendarla aplicación a otros pacientes con un promedio de 8,2en una escala de 0 a 10. CONCLUSIÓN: El nuevo pH-metro inteligenteLit-Control(R) pH Meter y la aplicación médica vinculadase consideraron útiles y aceptables por los pacientescon urolitiasis como herramienta válida para  la monitorización del pH de la orina en el hogar. Lastasas de cumplimiento de uso fueron elevadas y la satisfaccióngeneral con los productos fue alta.

Usefulness and acceptability of a Smart pH meter and mobile medical App as a monitoring tool in patients with urolithiasis: short-term prospective study

OBJECTIVES: An accurate strategy for regularly measuring urine pH is the use ofportable electronic pH meters. This study evaluated the usefulness and acceptability ofthe smart Lit-Control® pH Meter connected with a companion mobile medical application(myLit-Control App) used by patients with urolithiasis for home monitoring of urine pH.We also examined adherence and compliance rates, and users´ satisfaction levels.MATHERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective study conducted in10 centers from Spain. Adult patients with a history of urolithiasis were recruited andinstructed to carry out a pH measurement with the pH meter three times per day for twoweeks. User tasks included turning on the device, registration and on boardingprocesses in the App, sync the device and the App, and data dumping. At the end of thetrial, we evaluated the level of adherence and usage compliance. Participants’perceptions about the usefulness, acceptability, and satisfaction with the device/Appwere collected through the Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) andsubjective surveys.RESULTS: Participants were 27 men and 10 women. The mean age of participants was48.7 (SD = 10.4) years, ranging from 25 to 66. The predominant type of stone wascalcium oxalate. The mean pH of all readings was 8.83 (SD = 0.41). Twenty-seven (73%)patients met the “good adherence” criterion (not being more than 2 days withoutrecording any pH value). The compliance (actual vs. theoretical readings) was 87.6%.Participants rated the usability of the App 5.4 and above (on a 7-point scale) in all theitems of CSUQ. Satisfaction was high, as indicated by the mean score of 6.0 in item 16.In the subjective questionnaire (0 to 3 scale), nearly all mean values were above 2.Patients scored their probability to recommend the App with an average of 8.2 on a 0 to10 scale.CONCLUSION: The new smart Lit-Control® pH Meter and the accompanying medicalApp were deemed useful

OBJETIVOS: La utilización de pH-metros electrónicos portátiles supone una estrategiaprecisa para medir regularmente el pH de la orina. Este estudio evaluó la utilidad y laaceptabilidad del pH-metro inteligente Lit-Control® conectado con una aplicación móvilcomplementaria (myLit-Control App) para la monitorización domiciliaria del pH de laorina por pacientes con nefrolitiasis. También examinamos las tasas de adherencia ycumplimiento, y los niveles de satisfacción de los usuarios.MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo y multicéntrico realizadoen 10 centros de España. Se reclutaron pacientes adultos con antecedentes de litiasisurinaria, a los que se les indicó que realizaran una medición del pH con el pH-metro tresveces al día durante un período de dos semanas. Las tareas del usuario incluyeronencender el dispositivo, instalación y registro en la aplicación, sincronizar ambossistemas y volcado de datos. Al final de la prueba, evaluamos el nivel de adherencia ycumplimiento de la monitorización. Las percepciones de los participantes sobre lautilidad, aceptabilidad y satisfacción con el dispositivo/aplicación se obtuvieron a travésdel Cuestionario de Usabilidad de Sistemas Informáticos (CSUQ) y encuestassubjetivas.RESULTADOS: Los participantes fueron 27 hombres y 10 mujeres. La edad media delos participantes fue 48,7 (DE = 10,4) años, con un rango de 25 a 66. El tipo de cálculopredominante fue de oxalato de calcio. El pH-metro promedio de todas las lecturas fue5,83 (DE = 0,41). Veintisiete (73%) pacientes cumplieron el criterio de “buenaadherencia” (no estar más de 2 días sin registrar ningún valor de pH). El cumplimiento(lecturas reales frente a lecturas teóricas) fue del 87,6%. Los participantes calificaron lausabilidad de la aplicación en 5,4 o superior (en una escala de 7 puntos) en todos los ítems de CSUQ. La satisfacción fue alta, según la puntuación media de 6,0 en el ítem

Pharmacological interventions for preventing complications in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of pharmacological interventions in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria. METHODS: We performed a search of multiple databases, trial registries, grey literature and conference proceedings up to October 2019. We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that examined any pharmacological intervention for preventing complications of idiopathic hypercalciuria (given for at least four months and six of follow-up). The primary outcomes were stone-free patients, urinary symptoms and severe adverse events. RESULTS: We included five RCTs (n=446 patients, all adults, 4 in individuals with kidney stones and 1 in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis). Diuretics were likely to increase the number of stone-free patients (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.33-1.96, moderate quality of evidence (QoE)); 274 more stone-free patients/1000 patients treated (95% CI: 148-432) and produced a slight decrease in the stone formation rate (mean difference -0.18, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.06, low QoE); 180 fewer stones/year/1000 patients treated (95% CI: 300 r to 60). No data on urinary symptoms were reported. The association between diuretic use and severe adverse events was uncertain (RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.60-41.88, very low QoE); 4 more severe adverse events/1000 patients treated (95% CI: 0 fewer to 39 more). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of diuretics to a normal or modified diet probably reduces the number of stone recurrences and may decrease the stone formation rate. It is uncertain whether diuretics increase the occurrence of severe adverse events. There were no studies investigating other outcomes or in children.

The use of supine PNL technique for a tubeless procedure and shorter hospital stay: A comparison of supine and prone PNL procedures in 361 cases. / El uso de la técnica de NLP en decúbito supino para un procedimiento sin cámara y una estancia hospitalaria más corta: una comparación de los procedimientos de NLP en decúbito supino y prono en 361 casos.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of prone and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (P/SPNL) with special emphasis on tubeless (T) and totally tubeless (TT) surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-surgeon, consecutive series comparison study involved 361 consecutive patients who under went PNL operations in either the prone or Galdakao-modified Valdivia supine positions between September 2016 and March 2020. Indication for surgery was a stone diameter greater than 2 cm. The two groups were compared in terms of preoperative demographics, stone parameters, and perioperative data. RESULTS: The groups were similar in terms of preoperative demographics, while the blood transfusion rate was insignificantly higher in PPNL (7% vs 3.3%, p=0.165). Mean operative time (58.0±20.6 vs 54.1±15.9 min., respectively, p=0.165), fluoroscopy time (p=0.895), and Clavien complication rates (p=0.87) were similar. SPNL exhibited a significantly (p<0.001) higher rate of T operations (23, 37.7%) than PPNL (46, 15.3%). TT cases were also higher with SPNL (14% vs 29.5%,p=0.003). Urine leakage (p=0.085) and post-operative JJ stent placement (p=0.180) rates were statistically similar between the two groups. Length of hospital stay was approximately one day shorter for T cases in both groups (PPNL: 1.37±0.80 vs 2.26±1.28 days, p=0.001; SPNL: 1.65±0.83 vs 2.76±2.27 days, p=0.028). Stone free rates were 91.3% and 88.5% for PPNL and SPNL, respectively (p=0.488). CONCLUSION: SPNL has proved to be as safe and effective as its prone counter part, with similar stone-free and complication rates. T and TT-PNL seem more viable with SPNL, which will increase patient comfort and allow shorter hospitalization times.

OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de la nefrolitotomía percutánea en decúbito prono y supino (P/SPNL) con especial énfasis en la cirugía tubeless (T) y totalmente tubeless (TT).MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Este estudio comparativo retrospectivo, de un solo cirujano, de series consecutivas, involucró a 361 pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a operaciones de NLP en decúbito prono o en decúbito supino Valdivia modificado por Galdakao entre septiembre de 2016 y marzo de 2020. La indicación para la cirugía fue un diámetro de cálculo mayor de 2cm. Los dos grupos se compararon en términos de datos demográficos preoperatorios, parámetros de cálculos y datos perioperatorios. RESULTADOS: Los grupos fueron similares en términos de demografía preoperatoria, mientras que la tasa de transfusión de sangre fue insignificantemente mayor en PPNL (7% vs 3,3%, p=0,165). El tiempo operatorio medio (58,0 ± 20,6 vs 54,1 ± 15,9 min., respectivamente , p=0,165), el tiempo de fluoroscopia (p=0,895) y las tasas de complicaciones de Clavien (p=0,87) fueron similares. SPNL exhibió una tasa significativamente más alta (p<0,001) de operaciones T (23, 37,7%) que PPNL (46, 15,3%). Los casos de TT también fueron mayorescon SPNL (14% vs 29,5%, p=0,003). Las tasasde pérdida de orina (p=0,085) y colocación de stentJJ postoperatorio (p=0,180) fueron estadísticamente similares entre los dos grupos. La duración de la estancia hospitalaria fue aproximadamente un día más corta para los casos T en ambos grupos (PPNL: 1,37 ± 0,80vs 2,26 ± 1,28 días, p=0,001; NPSP: 1,65 ± 0,83 vs 2,76 ± 2,27 días, p=0,028). Las tasas de ausencia de cálculos fueron 91,3% y 88,5% para PPNL y SPNL ,respectivamente (p=0,488).CONCLUSIÓN: La NLPS ha demostrado ser tan segura y eficaz como su contraparte en decúbito prono, con tasas similares de complicaciones y ausencia de cálculos. T y TT-PNL parecen más viables con SPNL, lo que aumentará la comodidad del paciente y permitirá tiempos de hospitalización más cortos.